Change Synthesis
Essay
Due Tuesday, February 21
Question: What have we learned since The Great Depression?
Select an issue Steinbeck addresses in The Grapes of Wrath – attitudes towards immigration / migrant labor
or the poor, the impact of industrialization / technology on society, the banking
system, or any other of the many topics Steinbeck covers – and explore how American
attitudes and behaviors have changed (or failed to change) over time. Using
several of the pieces we have read in this unit, as well as your own personal
experiences, reading, and research, evaluate the transformation of society over
time. Support your thesis with direct quotations from multiple texts, properly formatted in MLA style.
Typed. Double Spaced. Twelve point. No blank lines between
paragraphs, except to indicate a major shift in tone or setting. Four – six
pages. Don’t forget a title.
Required:
·
Three rhetorical strategies from The Virtual Salt, underlined and labeled.
Push yourself to use the more complex strategies. Do the strategies have a clear, potent rhetorical effect?
·
A minimum of three college level sources - including at least one form Gale - plus The Grapes of Wrath. (That's four sources, if you're keeping score at home.) Everything's an Argument is a college level source.
·
A minimum of two “synthesis” paragraphs.
·
Properly formatted Works Cited Page.
Suggested: Consider the tone you want to set from the
outset. Narrative openings emphasize pathos. Openings filled with stats and
facts emphasize logos. What is the most effective tone for you to employ?
Suggested: Consider closing your essay with a plan of action.
Where do we go from here?
Audience: 1) “Society.” 2) Yourself.
Purpose: 1) To identify changes in American attitudes over time.
2) To evaluate America’s reaction to the problems posed by The Great Depression.
In your opinion, are we making progress?
How to approach this paper:
·
Identify an issue.
·
Establish conditions in society at the time Steinbeck
was writing; establish contemporary conditions.
·
Develop an opinion on whether we’ve improved /
progressed as a society.
·
Gather evidence (from our texts and from
research) to support your opinion. This is an argument; therefore, personal experience is valid evidence and
first person is an acceptable POV.
·
Consider counter arguments.
·
Create clear, defensible topic sentences.
·
Draft paragraphs with two quotations to support
your topic sentences.
·
Draft paragraphs with an eye towards ethos,
pathos, and logos.
·
Proofread to ensure your quotations are properly
formatted and cited. For this essay, “you will need to include the author’s
name in your parenthetical citation” (Kline 1).
·
Create your Works Cited page.
Is quoating lyrics a viable and liable source for this essay? I was looking at "Dust Bowl Dance," by Mumford & Sons.
ReplyDeleteGreat question! Bring it up in class.
ReplyDeleteWhen you take a quote from a quote within an article, how do you cite it?
ReplyDeleteEx:
Article writes that Someone says "This."
How would I cite this quote (I can't find the original source)?
I'll give you an example with a random quotation from the NY Times. It's from an article called "60 Lives, 30 Kidneys, All Linked" by Kevin Sack. Here's the way the source text looks:
ReplyDeleteDr. Robert A. Montgomery called it a "momentous feat" that demonstrated the potential for kidney exchanges to transform the field.
If I were going to quote this in a paper, I would write:
According to Kevin Sack, "Dr. Robert A. Montgomery called it a 'momentous feat' that demonstrated the potential for kidney exchanges to transform the field" (Sack).
Of course, I would have to establish the article and, if I could, Dr. Montgomery as well.
I want to qoute chunks of one sentence and link them to make a new sentence, but it's one of my "quotes", so do I simply use ellipses every time I omit parts of the sentence? or do I just piece the chunks together and use no ellipses?
ReplyDeleteIt depends how much you're eliding. I need to see the source text and two versions of quoting to be sure.
ReplyDelete“Owing to the…use of machinery…, work has lost ... all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine…” (Marx 470).
ReplyDeleteand
"Owing to the use of machinery, work has lost all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine..." (Marx 470).
Original:
"Owing to the extensive use of machinery and to division of labour, the work of the proletarians has last all individual character, and, consequently, all charm for the workman. He becomes...."
The second method is completely INcorrect. The first method is merely awkward and the many elisions hurt your ethos (it looks like the movie posters that quote only the positive phrase out of a scathing review).
ReplyDeleteThe original quotation isn't really long enough to demand elision. The problem is that the two closing phrases (the one about charm and the one about appendage) contain two different ideas. If you want the charm idea, just quote the whole thing and stop at workman. If you want the appendage idea, paraphrase Marx's argument and just quote the appendage sentence.